Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1744-5531|13|2|184-196
ISSN: 1744-5523
Source: International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.13, Iss.2, 2017-05, pp. : 184-196
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Compassion poses difficult challenges for the rule of law. The compassionate response is often cast as a deviation from settled law rather than a principled application of it. Compassion so understood is troubling, most obviously because it poses a challenge to overall fairness, notice and consistency. Although compassion is usually approached as a factor influencing substantive outcomes, I argue to the contrary that compassion cannot serve as a reliable indicator of who should prevail in legal debates. Whether compassion should inform substance is a normative question that must be answered in light of the purposes of the tribunal and the principles it seeks to advance. I propose instead that compassion's importance lies in its ability to aid decision-makers in understanding what is at stake for the litigant. In this sense, compassion is closely tied to humility: both are reminders of human fallibility and of the limits of individual understanding.
Related content
International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2017-05 ,pp. :
The Rule of Law and EU Expansion
By Mineshima D.
Liverpool Law Review, Vol. 24, Iss. 1-2, 2002-01 ,pp. :
The Rule of Law and its Limits
Law and Philosophy, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. :
Tax Avoidance and the Rule of Law
New Zealand Law Review, Vol. 2012, Iss. 2, 2012-06 ,pp. :