Development Theories and Methods of Fracture-Vug Carbonate Reservoirs

Author: Li   Yang  

Publisher: Elsevier Science‎

Publication year: 2017

E-ISBN: 9780128132470

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780128132463

Subject: TE344 carbonate reservoir

Keyword: Environmental science, engineering & technology,化学原理和方法

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

Development Theories and Methods of Fracture-Vug Carbonate Reservoirs explores the theories and methods for successful development of a fracture-vug reservoir by presenting the developmental strategies used in the Tahe oilfield.

Some of the theories and methods of developing the Tahe fracture-vug reservoirs have been inspired by two China national research projects: The ‘Basic research on development of fracture-vug carbonate reservoirs’ (2006-2010), and the ‘Basic research on production mechanism and oil recovery enhancement of fracture-vugcarbonate reservoirs’ (2011-2015), with support by the National Basic Research Program of China.

These theories and methods have facilitated the successful development of the fracture-vug reservoir in the Tahe oilfield, providing effective technologies and inspirations to developing similar reservoirs everywhere.

  • Provides information on both theoretical developments and technological innovations
  • Applies the modern karst formation characterization and the fracture-vug hierarchical structure to geological investigations of fracture-vug carbonate reservoirs
  • Introduces the karst facies-controlling 3D geologic modeling of fracture-vug reservoir formations
  • Proposes the coupled-processing and equivalent multi-medium numerical simulation methods of fracture-vug reservoirs
  • Presents development methodologies and techniques of water/gas flooding

Chapter

1.2 Developmental and evolutionary mechanism of palaeo-karst

1.2.1 Karst dynamic mechanism

1.2.2 Formation condition and controlling factors

1.2.2.1 Relationship between carbonate rock properties and karstification

1.2.2.2 Relationship between carbonatite structure and fracture-vug system

1.2.2.3 Relationship between geological structure and karstification

1.2.2.4 Effect of topographic and geomorphic conditions on karstification

1.2.2.5 Relationship between underground hydrodynamic circulation and karst development

1.2.3 Developmental and evolutionary mechanisms of paleo-karst in the Tahe region

1.2.3.1 Geological background

1.2.3.2 Formation conditions and controlling factors

1.2.3.3 Geochemical characteristics

1.2.3.4 Evolution features

1.3 Development pattern of carbonate fracture-vug system

1.3.1 Single-pipe underground stream system

1.3.2 Pipe network underground stream system

1.3.3 Tectonic corridor underground stream system

1.3.4 Hall-like cave system

1.3.5 Solution cave system

1.3.6 Shaft-like cave system

1.3.7 Fault-karst system

1.3.8 Solution fracture system

1.3.9 Reef shoal system

1.3.10 Dolomite system

1.4 Plane distribution features of fracture-vug systems in the Tahe Oilfield

1.4.1 Combined identification of the genesis of paleokarst geomorphology

1.4.2 Paleokarst geomorphology types and distribution features

1.4.3 Storage properties of paleokarst geomorphic units

1.5 Vertical distribution of fracture-vug systems in the Tahe Oilfield

1.5.1 Vertical zonation type in the Tahe Oilfield

1.5.2 Vertical distribution features of the fracture-vug system

1.6 Forming mechanism and development characteristics of fracture system

1.6.1 Forming mechanisms

1.6.2 Development characteristics

1.7 Filling materials and characteristics

1.7.1 Filling materials

1.7.2 Filling space

1.7.3 Filling degree

1.7.4 Filling characteristics

References

Further reading

2 Geophysical characterization of fracture-vug carbonate reservoirs

2.1 Seismic forward modeling

2.1.1 Physical modeling

2.1.1.1 How to make physical models

Geologic features of physical models

Model materials and model making

2.1.1.2 Physical modeling experiments

2.1.2 Numerical simulation

2.1.2.1 Random medium description

2.1.2.2 Variable-grid finite difference using elastic wave equation

2.1.2.3 Variable-grid numerical simulation using acoustic wave equation (VS&T)

2.1.2.4 Staggered-grid high-order finite difference using elastic wave equation with variable grid and time-step (VGTS)

2.2 Seismic responses of fracture-vug carbonate units

2.2.1 Seismic responses of isolated caverns

2.2.1.1 Theoretical analysis of scattered seismic waves in a single cavern

2.2.1.2 Seismic responses of single caves with varied sizes

Single-cavern responses

Amplitude analysis

Single-cave physical modeling experiment

2.2.1.3 Seismic responses of single caves with varied geometries

2.2.1.4 Seismic responses of single caves with different filling materials

2.2.2 Seismic responses of a complicated cave system

2.2.2.1 Seismic responses of random caves

2.2.2.2 Seismic responses of cave group

2.2.2.3 Numerical simulation of an actual geologic model

2.2.3 Seismic responses of fractures

2.2.3.1 P-wave azimuthal anisotropy in a vertically fractured medium

Analysis of experimental results

Azimuthal AVO responses

2.2.3.2 P-wave azimuthal anisotropy in a fractured medium with varied fracture dips

2.2.3.3 P-wave responses for varied fracture densities

2.2.4 Physical simulation of a 3D fracture-vug model

2.3 Seismic imaging

2.3.1 Offset plane-wave finite-difference prestack time migration

2.3.1.1 3D offset plane-wave decomposition

Slant stacking within a limited range

Azimuth-independent 3D slant stacking

2.3.1.2 3D offset plane-wave migration

2.3.1.3 Method testing

2.3.2 Time-shift depth migration and velocity analysis in angle domain

2.3.2.1 Imaging conditions for velocity analysis

2.3.2.2 Velocity updata

2.3.2.3 Velocity analysis workflow

2.3.2.4 Method testing

2.3.3 How to improve resolution of diffraction imaging

2.3.3.1 Diffracted waves on CSP gathers

2.3.3.2 Mapping noise suppression

2.3.3.3 Theoretical modeling

2.3.3.4 Field data testing

2.4 Reservoir description and fluid detection

2.4.1 Reservoir prediction

2.4.1.1 Cave prediction

Reflection configuration analysis

Strong amplitude clustering

Discontinuity detection

2.4.1.2 Fracture prediction

Curvature

Neural networks

2.4.2 Prestack azimuthal anisotropy-based fracture detection

2.4.2.1 Fracture prediction based on residual P-wave NMO for TTI media

Residual NMO for TTI media

Fracture detection based on residual P-wave NMO for TTI media

2.4.2.2 Fracture prediction based on P-wave AVO for TTI media

Theoretical basis

Model-based AVO inversion

2.4.3 Comprehensive description of fracture-vug units

2.4.3.1 Logging and seismic responses

2.4.3.2 Nonlinear reconstruction of log curves

2.4.3.3 Well-controlled frequency-divided inversion

2.4.3.4 Multiattribute optimization and fusion

2.4.3.5 Palaeogeomorphology-controlled sculpting

Palaeogeomorphologic study

Palaeogeomorphology-controlled sculpting

2.4.3.6 Petrophysical properties inversion

2.4.4 Fluid detection

2.4.4.1 Sensitivity analysis

Petrophysical model

Fluid substitution

Feasibility study

2.4.4.2 Prestack fluid detection

Prestack elastic impedance inversion

LMR inversion

2.4.4.3 Fluid probabilistic analysis based on AVO inversion

2.5 Comprehensive application of geophysical technology

2.5.1 Data quality and acquisition

2.5.1.1 High-density seismic acquisition

Lateral resolution

Bin size

Azimuth

Maximum offset

Fold

Recording geometry

2.5.1.2 High-density data processing

2.5.1.3 Discussions of 15-m cave identification

2.5.2 Fracture-vug units prediction

2.5.2.1 Fracture-vug units prediction

Poststack seismic attributes

Prestack azimuthal anisotropy-based fracture detection

2.5.2.2 Comprehensive description of fracture-vug reservoir

Detailed description

Apparent volume estimation

Goodness of fit

2.5.2.3 Fluid detection

Fluid detection based on prestack elastic inversion

Fluid probability analysis

3 3D geological modeling of a fracture-vug carbonate reservoir

3.1 Identification of fracture-vug reservoir

3.1.1 Pore space

3.1.1.1 Matrix

3.1.1.2 Caverns

3.1.1.3 Vugs

3.1.1.4 Fractures

Fracture development level and morphology

Dynamic indicator of fractures

3.1.2 Single-well identification of fracture-vug reservoirs

3.1.2.1 Cavernous reservoirs

3.1.2.2 Vug reservoirs

3.1.2.3 Large-scale fracture reservoirs

3.1.2.4 Microscale fracture reservoir

3.1.3 Cross-well identification of fracture-vug reservoirs

3.1.3.1 Identification of fracture-vug reservoir by seismic reflection feature

3.1.3.2 Identification of fracture-vug reservoir by wave impedance inversion

3.1.3.3 Identification of fracture-vug reservoir by seismic attribute volume

3.1.4 Distribution law of a fracture-vug reservoir

3.2 Characterization of fracture-vug unit

3.2.1 Division of a fracture-vug unit

3.2.2 Karst facies pattern

3.2.3 Characterization of a typical fracture-vug unit

3.3 3D modeling of a fracture-vug reservoir

3.3.1 Designing a 3D model grid

3.3.2 Building a 3D caverns model

3.3.3 Build a 3D vug model

3.3.4 Build a large-scale fracture model

3.3.5 Build a microscale discrete fracture network model

3.3.6 Fusion of discrete distribution models of fracture-vug carbonate reservoirs

3.4 Attribute parameter modeling of a fracture-vug carbonate reservoir

3.4.1 Attribute parameters

3.4.1.1 Attribute parameters for caverns

3.4.1.2 Attribute parameters for vugs

3.4.1.3 Attribute parameters for fractures

3.4.2 Attribute parameter modeling method

3.5 Verification and application

3.5.1 Verification by drilled well

3.5.2 Verification by production data

3.5.3 Verification by performance data

3.5.4 Application of geologic model

4 Fluid flow law in fracture-vug carbonate reservoir

4.1 Design of physical modeling experiment for fracture-vug media

4.1.1 Fundamental principles and similarity criteria

4.1.1.1 Fundamental principles

4.1.1.2 Similarity criteria

4.1.2 Physical modeling experiment design

4.1.2.1 Selecting experiment materials

4.1.2.2 Building experiment models

4.1.2.3 Physical modeling experiment system

4.2 Single-phase flow law in a fracture-vug medium

4.2.1 Single-phase flow experiments

4.2.1.1 On unfilled vug models

4.2.1.2 On fractured models

4.2.1.3 On fracture-vug models

4.2.2 Single-phase flow pattern and conversion conditions

4.2.2.1 Discrimination of flow pattern

4.2.2.2 Features of flow pattern conversion

4.3 Two-phase flow law in fracture-vug medium

4.3.1 Two-phase flow patterns

4.3.2 Oil–water two-phase flow experiment

4.3.2.1 On unfilled vug models

4.3.2.2 On fractured models

4.3.2.3 On fracture-vug models

4.3.3 Oil–water two-phase flow features

4.3.3.1 Relative permeability curves based on fractured models

4.3.3.2 Relative permeability curves based on fracture-vug models

4.4 Fluid flow law among different systems in fracture-vug media

4.4.1 Flow law between fracture and matrix

4.4.1.1 Experimental design and methodology

Physical property parameters of lab cores

Experimental method and workflow

4.4.1.2 Experimental results and analyses

4.4.1.3 Mathematical model and calculation

4.4.1.4 Crossflow law at pseudosteady state

4.4.2 Flow law between matrix and vug

4.4.2.1 Flow law between matrix and vug

4.4.2.2 Flow law between filler and vug

4.4.3 Flow law in different fracture-vug combinations

4.4.3.1 Flow law in single-vug–near-vug fracture (high dip) medium

4.4.3.2 Flow law in double-vug medium

4.4.3.3 Flow law in multifracture and multivug medium

4.5 Applications and numerical experimental study

4.5.1 Application

4.5.1.1 Production characteristics in isolated vug reservoirs

4.5.1.2 Production characteristics in a near-vug fracture reservoir

4.5.1.3 Production characteristics in vug-fracture-vug reservoir

4.5.2 Numerical experimental study

4.5.2.1 One-phase flow regime in fracture-vug medium

4.5.2.2 Two-phase flow regime in fracture-vug medium

5 Numerical simulation of a fracture-vug carbonate reservoir

Symbols and units

Nomenclature

Subcripts

Supercripts

Abbreviations

5.1 Mathematical model

5.1.1 Mathematical model for an equivalent multimedium reservoir

5.1.1.1 Equivalent multiple medium

5.1.1.2 Multimedium representative elementary volume

5.1.1.3 Equation of mass conservation of equivalent multimedium reservor

5.1.1.4 Pipe flow, fracture flow, and high-speed Darcy flow

5.1.1.5 Multiphase vug (cave) flow

5.1.1.6 Fluid flow interface in caverns

5.1.2 Coupling mathematical reservoir model

5.1.2.1 Continuity equation

5.1.2.2 Momentum equation

5.1.2.3 Equation of state

5.1.2.4 Equation of indicator function

5.1.2.5 Mathematical model

5.1.2.6 Boundary conditions

5.2 Numerical solution to fracture-vug reservoir model

5.2.1 Numerical solution based on equivalent multimedium model

5.2.1.1 Numerical simulation of Darcy flow

5.2.1.2 Numerical simulation of high-speed non-Darcy flow

5.2.1.3 Numerical simulation of cavern flow

5.2.1.4 Full-implicit algorithm

5.2.1.5 Solution of linear equations

5.2.2 Numerical solution based on the coupling model

5.2.2.1 Finite volume discretion in solution domain

5.2.2.2 Discretion of transfer equation

5.2.2.3 Discretion of momentum equation

5.2.2.4 Coupling solution of pressure–velocity equations

5.2.2.5 Solution to linear equations

5.3 Validation of numerical simulation method

5.3.1 Validation of equivalent multimedium numerical simulation

5.3.1.1 Numerical simulation

5.3.1.2 Simulation of high-speed non-Darcy flow

5.3.1.3 Physical experiment on a plate fracture-vug model

5.3.1.4 Comparison of KarstSim with similar software based on single-medium model

5.3.1.5 Comparison of KarstSim with similar software based on dual-medium model

5.3.2 Validation of coupling numerical modeling method

5.3.2.1 Physical experiment modeling of fluid flow in filled vugs

5.3.2.2 Two-phase numerical simulation in large caves (caverns)

5.3.2.3 Injection-recovery simulation in a cave-fracture-vug model

5.3.3 Numerical modeling on S48 fracture-vug unit

5.3.3.1 General description of S48

5.3.3.2 Production history fitting in S48

5.3.3.3 Functions of the numerical simulation software

6 Development technology for fracture-cavern carbonate reservoirs

6.1 Performance analysis techniques for fracture-cavern reservoirs

6.1.1 Variation characteristics and prediction model for individual well production

6.1.1.1 Variation characteristics of individual well production

6.1.1.2 Prediction model for individual well production

6.1.2 Evaluation of natural energy in fracture-cavern reservoir

6.1.2.1 Comprehensive evaluation index of natural energy – Dpr

6.1.2.2 Evaluation index of elastic energy – elastic productivity

6.1.2.3 Evaluation index for edge and bottom water energy – Npr

6.1.3 Numerical well testing model and interpretations for fracture-cavern reservoirs

6.1.3.1 Numerical well testing based on triple-porosity medium

6.1.3.2 Coupled flow well testing model and analytical method

6.1.3.3 Interpretation of testing data from fracture-cavern carbonate reservoirs of the Tahe Oil Field

6.2 Waterflooding development technology for fracture-cavern oil reservoirs

6.2.1 Waterflooding development mechanisms for fracture-cavern oil reservoirs

6.2.1.1 Recovery mechanisms of production wells in a cavern zone

6.2.1.2 Recovery mechanisms for production wells in fractured zone

6.2.1.3 Factors influencing development effectiveness and development countermeasures

6.2.2 Waterflooding development technology

6.2.2.1 Spatially structured well grid

6.2.2.2 Water injection timing

6.2.2.3 Water injection mode

6.2.2.4 Optimization of injection/production parameters

6.2.3 Evaluation of waterflooding effectiveness

6.2.3.1 Technical evaluation index system

6.2.3.2 Overall evaluation methods for fracture-cavern units

6.2.4 Analysis of field waterflooding development results

6.3 Nitrogen injection EOR technology for fracture-cavern reservoirs

6.3.1 Formation mechanism and distribution pattern of residual oil in fracture-cavern reservoirs

6.3.2 EOR technology by nitrogen injection for single wells

6.3.2.1 EOR mechanism of gas injection in single wells

6.3.2.2 Factors controlling the effectiveness of N2 injection in single wells

6.3.2.3 Well selection principles for gas injection in single well

6.3.2.4 Optimization of gas injection parameters for single well

6.3.3 Gas injection EOR technology for fracture-cavern units

6.3.4 Analysis of gas injection effectiveness

6.3.4.1 Effectiveness of typical single well gas injection

6.3.4.2 Effectiveness of typical well-cluster gas injection

6.4 Horizontal well sidetracking and reservoir stimulation technologies for fracture-cavern oil reservoirs

6.4.1 Small-radius horizontal well sidetracking technology for fracture-cavern oil reservoirs

6.4.1.1 Drilling string optimization technology for small-radius ultradeep sidetracked horizontal wells

6.4.1.2 Trajectory optimization technology for short-radius ultradeep sidetracked horizontal wells

6.4.2 Reservoir stimulation technology for fracture-cavern oil reservoirs

6.4.2.1 Prefrac effect prediction technology

6.4.2.2 Optimization and improvement of acid fracturing fluid

6.4.2.3 Fracture height control technology

6.4.2.4 Optimization and support of combined acid fracturing technology

6.4.3 Application results of sidetracking and acid fracturing

References

Index

Back Cover

The users who browse this book also browse