

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 2048-0849|67|issue|85-108
ISSN: 0066-1546
Source: Anatolian Studies, Vol.67, Iss.issue, 2017-07, pp. : 85-108
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Through analysis of a figurine assemblage from the site of Koçumbeli-Ankara, this study aims to re-evaluate the origins, meanings and functions of the Early Bronze Age (third millennium BC) anthropomorphic figurines of Anatolia. Conventional typological approaches to figurines are often focused on their origins and sex; however, such approaches hinder an understanding of the context of the norms of production, display and discard within which the figurines become more meaningful. Following an examination of breakage patterns and the decorative aspects of the Koçumbeli assemblage, a comparative review of figurine find contexts, raw materials and abstraction scales in Anatolia is provided, so that the social concerns underlying the use of these figurines can be explored. It is concluded that the origins of the figurines are difficult to pinpoint, due to the presence of similar items across a variety of regions of the Near East from the later Neolithic onwards. The sex of the figurines is equally ambiguous; while some human sexual features can be discerned, it is difficult to decide whether these features are ‘male’, ‘female’, both or beyond classification. Alternatively, the decoration, breakage and find contexts of the figurines suggest that the imagery was embedded in more complex perceptions of social status, death and social regeneration. The need for materialisation of these concerns in the form of the figurines could be related to the development of a new social landscape of interaction leading to political centralisation by the second millennium BC. Furthermore, the figurines were produced through a meaningful linking of particular raw materials and particular abstraction scales to particular use contexts, which seems to have shifted during the centralisation process.
Related content


Relational Typologies, Assemblage Theory and Early Bronze Age Burials
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Vol. 27, Iss. 1, 2017-01 ,pp. :


An Early Bronze Age Bracelet from Bridlington, Yorkshire
Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 28, Iss. 3-4, 1948-10 ,pp. :


An Early Bronze Age urn from Milton, Northamptonshire
Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, 1967-09 ,pp. :


Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 1932-01 ,pp. :


Dark Age anthropomorphic figurines from Brittany
Antiquity, Vol. 60, Iss. 230, 1986-11 ,pp. :