Response to: ‘On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores’ by Verger et al.

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1475-2727|20|11|2075-2075

ISSN： 1368-9800

Source： Public Health Nutrition, Vol.20, Iss.11, 2017-07, pp. : 2075-2075

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

On the appropriate use and interpretation of dietary diversity scores. Response to: ‘Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity’ by Koppmair and Qaim

By  

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2017-06 ,pp. : 2073-2074

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Farm production diversity and individual-level dietary diversity. Response to: ‘Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality’ by Verger et al.

By  

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2017-03 ,pp. : 2070-2072

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality

By  

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2016-12 ,pp. : 2067-2068

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: a different interpretation – response by Williams et al.

By  

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 103, Iss. 11, 2010-06 ,pp. : 1697-1697

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality – CORRIGENDUM

By  

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2017-04 ,pp. : 2069-2069

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite