China’s Cap on Coal and the Efficiency of Local Interventions: A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Phasing out Coal in Power Plants and in Households in Beijing 1

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 2152-2812|8|2|147-186

ISSN： 2194-5888

Source： Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol.8, Iss.2, 2017-07, pp. : 147-186

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Efficiency Potential in Social Programs: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Benefit-Cost Analysis 1

By  

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2017-03 ,pp. : 1-23

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Accounting for Nonmarket Impacts in a Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Coal Mining in New South Wales, Australia

By  

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2012-05 ,pp. : 1-29

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Energy Efficiency Gap in EPA’s Benefit-Cost Analysis of Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Regulations: A Case Study

By  

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2015-07 ,pp. : 432-454

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Toward Standardization of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Early Childhood Interventions

By  

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 1-45

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment on Burgess and Zerbe’s “Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis”

By  

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2011-08 ,pp. : 1-11

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite