Innovation, informed consent, health research and the Supreme Court: Montgomery v Lanarkshire – a brave new world?

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1744-134x|12|4|435-452

ISSN： 1744-1331

Source： Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol.12, Iss.4, 2017-04, pp. : 435-452

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Much ado about nothing: the US Supreme Court's rules on health reform

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2013-01 ,pp. : 125-132

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Health care reform after the Supreme Court: even more known unknowns

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2013-01 ,pp. : 139-143

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Courts and health care rationing: the case of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court

By  

Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2012-10 ,pp. : 75-93

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Additional Supreme Court Developments

By  

BRUCE R HOPKINS' NONPROFIT COUNSEL, Vol. 32, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 6-6

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Supreme Court's Ruling Concerning Health Insurance Exchanges and Tax Credits, and Its Implications

By  

BRUCE R HOPKINS' NONPROFIT COUNSEL, Vol. 32, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 4-5

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite