![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1467-9973|49|1-2|153-166
ISSN: 0026-1068
Source: METAPHILOSOPHY, Vol.49, Iss.1-2, 2018-01, pp. : 153-166
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is There an Alternative?
Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 1995-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Sustaining vs. resolving the quantitative-qualitative debate
By Krantz D.L.
Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 1995-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Quantitative-Qualitative Debates: ''DeKuhnifying'' the Conceptual Context
By Shadish W.R.
Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 1995-01 ,pp. :