Imprecise Probabilities and Unstable Betting BehaviourThis paper has its roots in the Managing Severe Uncertainty Group at the LSE (supported by the British Academy), and I continued to work on this while supported by the Leverhulme Trust. Thanks to Katie Steele and Alex Voorhoeve for discussion on this topic, and thanks also for the many invaluable questions and comments from audiences at the Birmingham Philosophy Society, the Vienna Forum for Analytic Philosophy, the Franco‐Swedish Program for Philosophy and Economics, and the Bristol‐Groningen Conference in Formal Epistemology.

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1468-0068|52|1|69-87

ISSN： 0029-4624

Source： NOUS, Vol.52, Iss.1, 2018-03, pp. : 69-87

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Putting Pluralism in its PlaceThis paper was first presented at a session on pluralism at the 1st Veritas Philosophy Conference at Yonsei University in Seoul, June 2014. My thanks go to Tim Fuller and Nikolaj Pedersen for the invitation to and organization of the conference, and to all those who attended and offered their feedback. Thanks go also to Derek Baker, Sam Baron, Jeremy Wyatt, and an anonymous referee for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Special thanks go to Dorit Bar‐On and Keith Simmons, and the members of their seminar on truth at the University of Connecticut in the spring of 2015. The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 23400014).

By  

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 96, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. : 175-191

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Knowledge of Our Own BeliefsThanks to audiences at Carnegie Mellon University, the Rutgers Epistemology Conference, the Berkeley‐London Graduate Philosophy Conference, the London School of Economics, and King's College London for helpful criticism and discussion. Thanks in particular to Teddy Seidenfeld, Glen Shafer, Philip Dawid, Nick Shea, and Matt Parrott.

By  

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 96, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. : 45-69

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Pragmatics of Empirical AdequacyThanks are due to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and to the University of Melbourne for support of this research. This paper has benefited from discussion with members of the Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science departments at the University of Melbourne and the Philosophy department at La Trobe University, as well as from the comments and suggestions of three anonymous referees.

By Brown Bryson  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, Iss. 2, 2004-06 ,pp. : 242-264

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Context of EssenceI'm indebted to David Lewis and John Hawthorne for discussion of a very early version of the ideas expressed in this paper, and to Frank Jackson, Kathrin Koslicki, Denis Robinson, Jason Stanley, Brian Weatherson and audiences at the 2001 Bellingham Summer Philosophy Conference, the 2001 Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Philosophy, and the University of Washington for comments on written versions.

By Jackson Frank   Priest Graham   Paul L. A.  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. : 170-184

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What Are Beall and Restall Pluralists About?Thanks to the attendees at the Western Canadian Philosophical Association Meetings of 2001 for a helpful discussion of this paper, and also to two anonymous referees for the AJP for their useful comments.

By Wyatt Nicole  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, Iss. 3, 2004-09 ,pp. : 409-420

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite