Is Best–Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments

E-ISSN： 1099-1050|26|12|e1-e16

ISSN： 1057-9230

Source： HEALTH ECONOMICS, Vol.26, Iss.12, 2017-12, pp. : e1-e16

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Validity of discrete-choice experiments evidence for health risk reduction

By Telser Harry Zweifel Peter

Applied Economics, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. : 69-78

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Testing the assumptions of rationality, continuity and symmetry when applying discrete choice experiments in health care

By Ryan Mandy Bate Angela

Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2001-01 ,pp. : 59-63

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Are Health State Valuations from the General Public Biased? A Test of Health State Reference Dependency Using Self‐assessed Health and an Efficient Discrete Choice Experiment

HEALTH ECONOMICS, Vol. 26, Iss. 12, 2017-12 ,pp. : 1534-1547

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bid Design Effects in Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation

By Vossler Christian

Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 401-418

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Combining Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments. A Forestry Application in Spain

By Mogas Joan

Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 43, Iss. 4, 2009-08 ,pp. : 535-551

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite