Sublingual vs Oral Misoprostol for Labor Induction

E-ISSN： 2278-0262|48|1|33-36

ISSN： 2277-8969

Source： Jourrnal of Postgraduate Medicine Education & Research, Vol.48, Iss.1, 2014-01, pp. : 33-36

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Sublingual vs Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction

Jourrnal of Postgraduate Medicine Education & Research, Vol. 46, Iss. 3, 2012-07 ,pp. : 138-143

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Oral Misoprostol vs Intravenous Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

Journal of SAFOG, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2016-01 ,pp. : 4-7

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol

By Crane JMG Delaney T Butt KD Bennett KA Hutchens D Young DC

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 15, Iss. 5, 2004-05 ,pp. : 319-323

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Oral and Vaginal Administration of Low-dose Misoprostol for Labor Induction

Journal of SAFOG, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 137-140

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sublingual 400 μg Misoprostol vs Intravenous 0.2 mg Methylergometrine for Active Management of Third Stage of Labor

Journal of SAFOG, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2013-01 ,pp. : 15-18

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite