Related content

Differential use of the CAHPS^® 0–10 global rating scale by medicaid and commercial populations

By Damiano Peter   Elliott Marc   Tyler Margaret   Hays Ron  

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, Vol. 5, Iss. 3-4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 193-205

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Value measurement in cost-utility analysis: explaining the discrepancy between rating scale and person trade-off elicitations

By Ubel P.A.   Loewenstein G.   Scanlon D.   Kamlet M.  

Health Policy, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 1998-01 ,pp. : 33-44

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Development and Initial Validation of the Effort Sense Rating Scale (ESRS): A Self-Perceived Index of Physical Fitness

By Williams J.G.   Purewal R.S.  

Preventive Medicine, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, 2001-02 ,pp. : 103-108

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scale formats for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): Does format affect patient ratings of symptoms and quality of life?

By Hollen P.J.   Gralla R.J.   Kris M.G.   McCoy S.   Donaldson G.W.   Moinpour C.M.  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2005-04 ,pp. : 837-847

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Who Can Best Influence the Quality of Teenagers’ Cars?

By Keall Michael D.  

Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2013-02 ,pp. : 293-298

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite