Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted

ISSN： 0340-5761

Source： Archives of Toxicology, Vol.83, Iss.3, 2009-03, pp. : 227-247

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Maturing of Hormesis as a Credible Dose-Response Model

By Calabrese Edward J.

Nonlinearity in Biology, Vol. 1, Iss. 3, 2003-07 ,pp. : 319-343

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leukemia incidence of 96,000 Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors is compelling evidence that the LNT model is wrong: Edward Calabrese’s papers “Origin of the linear no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept” (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:1621–1633) and “How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response” (Arch Toxicol (2013) 87:2063–2081)

By Cuttler Jerry

Archives of Toxicology, Vol. 88, Iss. 3, 2014-03 ,pp. : 847-848

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Latent Pharmacokinetic Time Profile to Model Dose-Response Survival Data

By Jacobs Tom

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, 2010-07 ,pp. : 759-767

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Statistical Procedures to Test for Linearity and Estimate Threshold Doses for Tumor Induction with Nonlinear Dose–Response Relationships in Bioassays for Carcinogenicity

By Lutz R.W. Stahel W.A. Lutz W.K.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 36, Iss. 3, 2002-12 ,pp. : 331-337

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Quetiapine: Dose-Response Relationship in Schizophrenia

By Citrome Leslie

CNS Drugs, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. : 69-72

Adis International

Access to resources Recommend Favorite