

Author: Gittelson Simone
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0924-8463
Source: Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol.21, Iss.2, 2013-05, pp. : 221-252
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The forensic two-trace problem is a perplexing inference problem introduced by Evett (J Forensic Sci Soc 27:375-381, 1987). Different possible ways of wording the competing pair of propositions (i.e., one proposition advanced by the prosecution and one proposition advanced by the defence) led to different quantifications of the value of the evidence (Meester and Sjerps in Biometrics 59:727-732, 2003). Here, we re-examine this scenario with the aim of clarifying the interrelationships that exist between the different solutions, and in this way, produce a global vision of the problem. We propose to investigate the different expressions for evaluating the value of the evidence by using a graphical approach, i.e. Bayesian networks, to model the rationale behind each of the proposed solutions and the assumptions made on the unknown parameters in this problem.
Related content


DYNAMIC MODELING OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTANTS WITH BAYESIAN NETWORKS
Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2008-04 ,pp. :


Propagation in CLG Bayesian networks based on semantic modeling
By Zhu Mingmin
Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 38, Iss. 2, 2012-08 ,pp. :




Two techniques in the area of the star problem in trace monoids
Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 309, Iss. 1, 2003-12 ,pp. :