

Author: Smith Ursula E.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1063-5157
Source: Systematic Biology, Vol.62, Iss.3, 2013-05, pp. : 366-385
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Despite being the objects of numerous macroevolutionary studies, many of the best represented constituents of the fossil recordincluding diverse examples such as foraminifera, brachiopods, and molluskshave mineralized skeletons with limited discrete characteristics, making morphological phylogenies difficult to construct. In contrast to their paucity of phylogenetic characters, the mineralized structures (tests and shells) of these fossil groups frequently have distinctive shapes that have long proved useful for their classification. The recent introduction of methodologies for including continuous data directly in a phylogenetic analysis has increased the number of available characters, making it possible to produce phylogenies based, in whole or part, on continuous character data collected from such taxa. Geometric morphometric methods provide tools for accurately characterizing shape variation and can produce quantitative data that can therefore now be included in a phylogenetic matrix in a nonarbitrary manner. Here, the marine gastropod genus
Related content


Phylogenetic Signal in AFLP Data Sets
By KOOPMAN WIM
Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, Iss. 2, 2005-04 ,pp. :






Building Phylogenetic Trees from Molecular Data with MEGA
Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 30, Iss. 5, 2013-05 ,pp. :