When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms

Author： Camilleri Adrian  

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 1069-9384

Source： Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol.18, Iss.2, 2011-04, pp. : 377-384

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

When and why people are comparatively optimistic about future health risks: The role of direct and indirect comparison measures

By Rose Jason P.  

Psychology, Health and Medicine, Vol. 16, Iss. 4, 2011-08 ,pp. : 475-483

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test

By Marsh Elizabeth J.  

Memory, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 2012-08 ,pp. : 645-653

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Protocol for Measuring the Direct Psychological Benefit of Neuropsychological Assessment with Feedback in Multiple Sclerosis

By  

Brain Impairment, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2012-09 ,pp. : 238-255

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reader Feedback

By  

Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 1986-09 ,pp. : 19-19

Guilford Publications Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Development of Depressogenic Cognitive Styles: The Role of Negative Childhood Life Events and Parental Inferential Feedback

By Crossfield Alisa G.   Alloy Lauren B.   Gibb Brandon E.   Abramson Lyn Y.  

Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Vol. 16, Iss. 4, 2002-10 ,pp. : 487-502

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite