Integrated Management in Large River Basins: 12 Lessons from the Mekong and Murray-Darling Rivers

Author： Campbell Ian Hart Barry Barlow Chris

Publisher： E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung

ISSN： 1868-5749

Source： River Systems, Vol.20, Iss.3-4, 2013-04, pp. : 231-247

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Although every large river basin is unique, we identify 12 broadly applicable lessons related to integrated management which river basin managers should bear in mind. These are: the size of a river basin has an important influence on the complexities of management; decision makers tend to give priority to stakeholders seeking to gain short term personal benefit; river basin managers often fail to learn from the experience of others, or even from past mistakes in their own river basin; preventing river basin degradation is far cheaper than repairing damage; a basin plan does not replace a basin planning process; basin plans and their implementation must strike an appropriate balance between stakeholders; sound knowledge is essential in evidence-based decision making, but decisions are ultimately political and involve value judgments; technical work must be peer reviewed to ensure quality; the emphasis on the fishery in basin planning is often unrelated to the importance of the fish to human subsistence; asset-based management approaches are very complex in large river basins; large scale developments attract a lot of planning attention, but basins are often degraded through numerous small scale impacts.