Author: Swartz Leslie Tomlinson Mark Landman Mireille
Publisher: The Clifford Beers Foundation
ISSN: 1462-3730
Source: The International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, Vol.6, Iss.1, 2004-02, pp. : 33-38
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The relationship between research evidence, policy and implementation is complex throughout the world, but where resources are scarce (especially in developing countries) there is a need to ensure rational implementation. With reference to a study on which we work, we show how the simple act of conducting research where resources are lacking affects implementability. We discuss five key issues with which researchers must engage if they wish to affect policy and implementation: evidence is not the only criterion by which implementation decisions are made, implementation decisions are often political rather than health-oriented in the narrow sense, there is often a difference in time scale between research enterprises and policy implementation, moving from research to the 'real world' requires engagement with existing organisational systems, and we need to be able to tell the difference between changes in rhetoric and changes in the real world. The broad international context of funding and the scientific community also affect how researchers work in developing countries. We suggest that engagement with these apparently 'non-scientific' concerns is essential to the work of researchers.
Related content
Mental health promotion policies in Europe
Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2011-04 ,pp. :
Editorial Mental health promotion
Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1996-02 ,pp. :