![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN: 1464-5149
Source: History and Philosophy of Logic, Vol.29, Iss.4, 2008-11, pp. : 385-387
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Against Williamson's Arguments About Bivalence
PHILOSOPHICAL FORUM, Vol. 47, Iss. 3-4, 2016-09 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Parfit's arguments for the present-aim theory
By Hooker Brad
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 70, Iss. 1, 1992-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Human Nonmonotonic Reasoning: the Importance of Seeing the Logical Strength of Arguments
By Ford Marilyn
Synthese, Vol. 146, Iss. 1-2, 2005-08 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Skepticism about Practical Reason: Transcendental Arguments and Their Limits
By Skidmore J.
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 109, Iss. 2, 2002-05 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
The Onus of Proof in Arguments About the Problem of Evil
Religious Studies, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 1981-03 ,pp. :