

Author: Gibbons S. Legg C.
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 0004-8402
Source: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.91, Iss.1, 2013-03, pp. : 119-138
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
We discuss the one-many problem as it appears in the Philebus</i> and find that it is not restricted to the usually understood problem about the identity of universals across particulars that instantiate them (the Hylomorphic Dispersal Problem</i>). In fact some of the most interesting aspects of the problem occur purely with respect to the relationship between Forms. We argue that contemporary metaphysicians may draw from the Philebus</i> at least three different one-many relationships between universals themselves: instantiation</i>, subkind</i> and part</i>, and thereby construct three new `problems of the one and the many' (an Eidetic Dispersal Problem</i>, a Genus-Species Problem</i>, and an Eidetic Combination Problem</i>), which are as problematic as the version generally discussed. We then argue that this taxonomy sheds new and interesting light on certain discussions of higher-order universals in recent Australian analytic philosophy.
Related content


One/Many Problems: Philebus 14c1‐15c3
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1996-03 ,pp. :


False Pleasures and Plato's Philebus
By Reidy D.A.
The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, 1998-09 ,pp. :




One and Many in Aristotle's Metaphysics: The Central Books
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2008-09 ,pp. :


The Place of the Philebus in Plato's Dialogues1
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 1980-01 ,pp. :