

Author: McAllister Hunter
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0147-7307
Source: Law and Human Behavior, Vol.35, Iss.2, 2011-04, pp. : 104-109
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The experiment tested prospective and retrospective memory for a person pictured on a wanted poster. Participants monitored the videotaped activity of a computer lab; one of their duties involved reporting if they saw a computer hacker. Half viewed a wanted poster of the hacker before the monitoring task and half after. For half the participants, the hacker appeared during monitoring and for half not. A diagnosticity ratio comparing the correct prospective memory identifications with false positive identifications showed that a prospective identification was 3.35 times more likely to be accurate than inaccurate. For those viewing the wanted poster after monitoring, the diagnosticity ratio was 1.21. Based on diagnosticity, a prospective identification had more value than a retrospective identification.
Related content


Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 1926-11 ,pp. :


By Neuschatz Jeffrey Lawson Deah Fairless Andrew Powers Ráchael Neuschatz Joseph Goodsell Charles Toglia Michael
Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 31, Iss. 3, 2007-06 ,pp. :


The Menace of Retrospective Severance in Bankruptcy
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 55, Iss. 1, 1996-03 ,pp. :


Sheep Eat Men: A Retrospective Proverb
Moreana, Vol. 51(Number197-198), Iss. 3-4, 2014-12 ,pp. :


Retrospective sur Alost, Bruges, Louvain
Moreana, Vol. 11(Number41), Iss. 2, 1974-03 ,pp. :