Author: Fox Danny
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0925-854X
Source: Natural Language Semantics, Vol.19, Iss.1, 2011-03, pp. : 87-107
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
We present an argument for revising the theory of alternatives for Scalar Implicatures and for Association with Focus. We argue that in both cases the alternatives are determined in the same way, as a contextual restriction of the focus value of the sentence, which, in turn, is defined in structure-sensitive terms. We provide evidence that contextual restriction is subject to a constraint that prevents it from discriminating between alternatives when they stand in a particular logical relationship with the assertion or the prejacent, a relationship that we refer to as symmetry. Due to this constraint on contextual restriction, discriminating between alternatives in cases of symmetry becomes the task of focus values. This conclusion is incompatible with standard type-theoretic definitions of focus values, motivating our structure-sensitive definition instead.
Related content
Language and Computers, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2001-06 ,pp. :
Entertaining Alternatives: Disjunctions as Modals
By Geurts Bart
Natural Language Semantics, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2005-12 ,pp. :
Structurally defined alternatives and lexicalizations of XOR
By Swanson Eric
Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 2010-02 ,pp. :
The irreality of alternatives: Towards a typology of disjunction
Studies in Language, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. :