Reply to the letter by J. Molina-Infante et al. regarding “Patients with esophageal eosinophilia”

ISSN： 0944-1174

Source： Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol.46, Iss.5, 2011-05, pp. : 714-715

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Reply to letter from Sebastian F. Schoppmann et al. regarding `Radial esophageal acid exposure and the dilated distal esophagus'

By Ohara Shunji

Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 47, Iss. 11, 2012-11 ,pp. : 1277-1278

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to the Letter by Gerriets et al.

Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2004-12 ,pp. : I-

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to R Loffroy's letter to the Editor re: M May et al. Pre-operative renal arterial embolisation does not provide survival benefit in patients with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2009;82:724–31.

By BROOKMAN-MAY S BURGER M WIELAND W F MAY M

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 83, Iss. 991, 2010-07 ,pp. : 631-632

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to the Letter by van Breda et al.: Reduction of Body Temperature with Paracetamol in Patients with Acute Stroke: Randomized Clinical Trials Are Needed

Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 351-

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to the Letter by Bernhardt et al.: Mobilisation ‘in Bed’ Is Not Mobilisation

Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2007-06 ,pp. : 159-159

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite