Discussion of “Predictive Comparison of Joint Longitudinal-Survival Modeling: A Case Study Illustrating Competing Approaches”, by Hanson, Branscum and Johnson

Author： Taylor Jeremy  

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 1380-7870

Source： Lifetime Data Analysis, Vol.17, Iss.1, 2011-01, pp. : 29-32

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Discussion of: predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches

By Craiu Radu  

Lifetime Data Analysis, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 33-36

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches

By Hanson Timothy  

Lifetime Data Analysis, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 3-28

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rejoinder for “Predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches”

By Johnson Wesley  

Lifetime Data Analysis, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 37-42

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Identification of longitudinal biomarkers for survival by a score test derived from a joint model of longitudinal and competing risks data

By Ko Feng-Shou  

Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 41, Iss. 10, 2014-10 ,pp. : 2270-2281

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Dynamic prediction of mortality among patients in intensive care using the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score: a joint competing risk survival and longitudinal modeling approach

By  

Statistica Neerlandica, Vol. 72, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. : 34-47

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite