A Cognitive Science of Religion Will Be Difficult, Expensive, Complicated, Radically Counter-Intuitive, and Possible: A Response to Martin and Wiebe

Author： McCauley Robert N.  

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 1477-4585

Source： Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol.80, Iss.3, 2012-09, pp. : 605-610

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A Response to Martin and Wiebe

By Taves Ann  

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 80, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 601-604

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Response to Martin and Wiebe

By Frankenberry Nancy  

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 80, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 598-600

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Back to the Future: A Response to Martin and Wiebe

By Slingerland Edward  

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 80, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. : 611-617

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The cognitive science of religion: a modified theist response

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 47, Iss. 3, 2010-07 ,pp. : 301-316

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Perspectives on reflection and intuition in teacher practice: a comparison and possible integration of the cognitive constructivist and the Dreyfusian intuitive perspectives

By Åsvoll Håvard  

Reflective Practice, Vol. 13, Iss. 6, 2012-12 ,pp. : 789-804

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite