

Author: Kelp Christoph
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0039-7857
Source: Synthese, Vol.179, Iss.3, 2011-04, pp. : 409-433
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In a number of recent papers Duncan Pritchard argues that virtue epistemology’s central ability condition—one knows that p if and only if one has attained cognitive success (true belief) because of the exercise of intellectual ability—is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge. This paper discusses and dismisses a number of responses to Pritchard’s objections and develops a new way of defending virtue epistemology against them.
Related content


Virtue Epistemology and Moral Luck
By Silcox Mark
Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2006-07 ,pp. :


Virtue epistemology and the acquisition of knowledge
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. :


Pritchard on Virtue Epistemology
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 2009-10 ,pp. :


Epistemic Virtues and Virtue Epistemology
By Brady Michael Pritchard Duncan
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 130, Iss. 1, 2006-07 ,pp. :


Distinguishing virtue epistemology and extended cognition
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2012-06 ,pp. :