False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter?

Author： Horselenberg Robert Merckelbach Harald Smeets Tom Franssens Dirk Ygram Peters Gjalt-Jorn Zeles Gwenny

ISSN： 1068-316X

Source： Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol.12, Iss.1, 2006-01, pp. : 61-75

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

When plausibility manipulations work: An examination of their role in the development of false beliefs and memories

By Bays Rebecca B.

Memory, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 2012-08 ,pp. : 638-644

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The roles of interrogation, perception, and individual differences in producing compliant false confessions

By Blair J. P.

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2007-04 ,pp. : 173-186

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND FALSE CONFESSIONS: A CONCEPTUAL REPLICATION OF KASSIN AND KIECHEL (1996)

By HORSELENBERG R. MERCKELBACH H. JOSEPHS S.

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. : 1-8

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Interrogation and false confessions among adolescents in seven European countries. What background and psychological variables best discriminate between false confessors and non-false confessors?

By Gudjonsson Gisli Hannes

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 15, Iss. 8, 2009-10 ,pp. : 711-728

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise?

By Blandon-Gitlin Iris

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2011-03 ,pp. : 239-260

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite