Clinical evaluation of VEPs to interleaved checkerboard reversal stimulation of central, hemi- and peripheral fields

By Brusa A.   Mortimer C.   Jones S.J.  

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials Section, Vol. 96, Iss. 6, 1995-11 ,pp. : 485-494

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effects of Attention on Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials: Foveal Field Stimulation Versus Peripheral Field Stimulation

By Hoshiyama M.   Kakigi R.  

Brain Topography, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2001-01 ,pp. : 293-298

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Interocular interaction assessed by VEPs to pattern-onset, -reversal, and -offset in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects

By Shawkat F.S.   Kriss A.  

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials Section, Vol. 104, Iss. 1, 1997-01 ,pp. : 74-81

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Central motor conduction time by magnetic stimulation of the cortex and peripheral nerve conduction follow-up studies in Friedreich's ataxia

By Cruz-Martnez A.   Palau F.  

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Electromyography and Motor Control, Vol. 105, Iss. 6, 1997-12 ,pp. : 458-461

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Difference in P300 response between hemi-field visual stimulation

By Suzuki Megumi  

Neurological Sciences, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, 2011-08 ,pp. : 603-608

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite