Differences in the perception of and reasoning about quid pro quo sexual harassment

ISSN： 1470-1073

Source： Psychology, Evolution & Gender, Vol.3, Iss.3, 2001-12, pp. : 241-264

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment

By Paludi Michele A. Barichman Richard B. Spratlen Lois P.

Violence and Victims, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 1992-01 ,pp. : 187-188

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bystanders’ Reactions to Sexual Harassment

By Benavides-Espinoza Claudia Cunningham George

Sex Roles, Vol. 63, Iss. 3-4, 2010-08 ,pp. : 201-213

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sexual Harassment Revisited: An Opinion

By Adams Kenneth M.

Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Vol. 9, Iss. 2-3, 2002-04 ,pp. : 87-88

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Self-Labeling Sexual Harassment

By Magley Vicki Shupe Ellen

Sex Roles, Vol. 53, Iss. 3-4, 2005-08 ,pp. : 173-189

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tolerance of Sexual Harassment: An Examination of Gender Differences, Ambivalent Sexism, Social Dominance, and Gender Roles

By Russell Brenda L. Trigg Kristin Y.

Sex Roles, Vol. 50, Iss. 7-8, 2004-04 ,pp. : 565-573

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite