Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument

ISSN： 0920-427X

Source： Argumentation, Vol.13, Iss.1, 1999-02, pp. : 27-42

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Swinburne's argument for the existence of God: a critical comment on conceptual issues

Religious Studies, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 2014-03 ,pp. : 359-378

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations

By Simosi M.

Argumentation, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2003-01 ,pp. : 185-202

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion

By Henkemans A. F. Snoeck

Argumentation, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 2003-01 ,pp. : 405-419

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument

By Walton D. N.

Argumentation, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, 2004-01 ,pp. : 359-368

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The maximin rule argument for Rawls's principles of justice

By Langtry Bruce

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 63, Iss. 1, 1985-03 ,pp. : 64-77

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite