Semantic Shifts in Argumentative Processes: A Step Beyond the `Fallacy of Equivocation'

Author： deppermann A.  

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 0920-427X

Source： Argumentation, Vol.14, Iss.1, 2000-02, pp. : 17-30

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Fallacies, Blunders, and Dialogue Shifts: Walton's Contributions to the Fallacy Debate

By Tindale C.W.  

Argumentation, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 1997-08 ,pp. : 341-354

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality?

By Cummings L.  

Argumentation, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2003-01 ,pp. : 161-183

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity

By Kroon Frederick   McKeown-Green Jonathan  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 83, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. : 423-430

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Fallacy of Consent

By Maloberti Nicolás  

The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 44, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 469-476

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Fallacious Fallacy?

By Hintikka Jaakko  

Synthese, Vol. 140, Iss. 1-2, 2004-05 ,pp. : 25-35

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite