Author: Stein David B.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1523-150X
Source: Ethical Human Sciences and Services, Vol.4, Iss.3, 2002-01, pp. : 235-238
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Since the late 1970s, hundreds of studies have been conducted suggesting a variety of brain and nervous system anomalies as proof that ADD/ADHD are diseases. None of these findings can be demonstrated at the clinical level, but the sheer volume of publications temporarily serves as persuasive evidence for many professionals and members of the public. However, the 1998 National Institutes of Health ADHD Consensus Panel cast serious doubts on the credibility of the disease perspective. As a result, a new strategy may be emerging to reify ADD/ADHD as biologically based disorders by redesignating them as "developmental disorders" and perhaps ultimately as pervasive developmental disorders. Still, the new designation remains as hopelessly vague as the older one.
Related content
By COHEN DAVID
Ethical Human Sciences and Services, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2002-01 ,pp. :
Commentary: ADHD and Substance Abuse
Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, 2011-04 ,pp. :
New therapeutic strategy for amyloidosis
By Morinaga Akiyoshi Ono Kenjiro Yamada Masahito
Future Neurology, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 2009-05 ,pp. :