Author： Cross Roger L.
Publisher： Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
ISSN： 0888-045X
Source： The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, Vol.24, Iss.2, 2011-08, pp. : 140-144
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Purpose ‐ The rise of academic librarian professionalism coincided with the consolidation and centralization of university libraries. The resulting consolidation of the materials budget offered a revenue stream exploited by increasingly large publishers. Since publishers will always attempt to maximize their profits, the only way to restrict unlimited access to library funds is through reverting to decentralization. One such method is the creation of modules without overlapping funding. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach ‐ This paper relies on a wide range of academic library economic literature in an attempt to clarify the structural problem of library budgeting as well as to find means to reverse the slide into budgetary collapse. Findings ‐ Professional librarians have over-centralized academic libraries. This has provided publishers in the past with profitable revenue streams that continue to expand even while the library's ability to maintain funding has contracted. Since publishers will not impose limits on maximizing their profits, it is up to the librarian to impose strictures on available funding. Originality/value ‐ This paper argues that there is a causal relation between the rise of increasingly large for-profit publishing and the rise of the centralized big academic library run by library professionals. It proposes the decentralization of academic library budgets as a means to regain fiscal control.
Related content
Teaching about library budgets
The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 1999-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
