

Author: Weir Charlie Laing David
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
ISSN: 0955-534X
Source: European Business Review, Vol.13, Iss.2, 2001-03, pp. : 86-95
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
A number of Committees have been set up in recent years to investigate the governance of UK quoted companies. The key one was the Cadbury Committee, which recommended a number of governance structures as examples of best practice. These included the separation of the posts of CEO and chairman, a significant representation of non-executive directors, the importance of non-executive director independence and the setting up of board subcommittees. This study finds that there has been widespread adoption of the recommended governance structures. However, there is no clear relationship between governance structures and corporate performance. This raises questions about the most effective type of governance mechanism and whether or not the prescriptive recommendations of Cadbury should be replaced with a more flexible approach.
Related content


Corporate governance, performance and take-overs: an empirical analysis of UK mergers
By Weir Charlie
Applied Economics, Vol. 29, Iss. 11, 1997-11 ,pp. :


Board governance and corporate performance
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, Vol. 45, Iss. 1-2, 2018-01 ,pp. :




Enterprise Performance and Corporate Governance in Ukraine
Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 27, Iss. 3, 1999-09 ,pp. :


Institutional investors, corporate governance and the performance of the corporate sector
By Davis E.P.
Economic Systems, Vol. 26, Iss. 3, 2002-09 ,pp. :