Author： Osterweil Michal
Publisher： Palgrave Macmillan Ltd
ISSN： 1461-7072
Source： Development, Vol.48, Iss.2, 2005-06, pp. : 23-28
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Michal Osterweil argues that although there is a broad consensus about the fact that the global justice movement is comprised of a diversity of political approaches, the more subtle and radical differences in political practices and visions among various actors are often not visible. She suggests this is because while we might all agree that the global nature of this movement is crucial, defining globality and what the politics of a global movement are still a matter of great debate. She contrasts ‘place-based globalism’ to the political–institutional areas of the movement and what she labels ‘universalizing globalists.’Development (2005) 48, 23–28. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100132
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Global Justice: Portrait of a movement
Development, Vol. 48, Iss. 2, 2005-06 ,pp. :
Funding and the Future of the Global Justice Movement
Development, Vol. 49, Iss. 2, 2006-06 ,pp. :
Race and Gender in the Limits of Place-based Politics
Development, Vol. 45, Iss. 1, 2002-03 ,pp. :
ATTAC: A citizens' movement for global justice responds to September 11th
By George Susan
Development, Vol. 45, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. :