Continuous versus cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception: systematic Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials*This paper is based on a Cochrane review published in the Cochrane Library, 2005 issue 3, (see www.thecochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and the Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.

By Edelman A.   Gallo M.F.   Nichols M.D.   Jensen J.T.   Schulz K.F.   Grimes D.A.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 21, Iss. 3, 2006-03 ,pp. : 573-578

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Metformin versus oral contraceptive pill in polycystic ovary syndrome: a Cochrane review

By Costello Michael F.   Shrestha Bhushan   Eden John   Johnson Neil P.   Sjoblom Peter  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2007-05 ,pp. : 1200-1209

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The diaphragm with and without spermicide for contraception: a Cochrane review

By Cook L.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 2002-04 ,pp. : 867-869

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation

By Rho R.W.  

Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2003-09 ,pp. : 290-291

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Contraception. Recurrent use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism

By Suissa S.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, 2000-04 ,pp. : 817-821

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite