Author： Graver Margaret
Publisher： Brill
ISSN： 1568-5284
Source： Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol.44, Iss.4, 1999-08, pp. : 300-325
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The concept of oαα or "pre-emotions" is known not only to the Roman Stoics and Christian exegetes but also to Philo of Alexandria. Philo also supplies the term oαα at QGen 1.79. As Philo cannot have derived what he knows from Seneca (despite his visit to Rome in 39), nor from Cicero, who also mentions the point, he must have found it in older Stoic writings. The oαα concept, rich in implications for the voluntariness and phenomenology of the passions proper, is thus confirmed for the Hellenistic period. It is not to be expected that Philo's handling of this or any concept will necessarily conform to the usage of his Stoic sources. His evidence is nonetheless of great value where it coincides with that of other witnesses. In QGen 4.73 the emphasis falls upon involuntariness and the mechanisms of impression and assent as in Epictetus fr. 9. The oαα saves the virtuous person's insusceptibility to emotion exactly as it does for the Stoic spokesman in Gellius NA 19.1; this point is of some interest in view of the Christological use of this concept in Origen and Didymus. QGen 1.55 and 3.56 indicate that the occurrence of the oαα is dependent upon uncertainty, and further, that for Philo, as for Seneca in Ira 2.3.4, a thought not acted upon can count as a oαα. In QGen 4.15-17 and 1.79, Philo indicates that hope and perhaps laughter may be related to joy as oαα to αo; these assertions are not paralleled in extant Stoic texts. Further, in QGen 2.57, he names "biting and contraction" as the αα corresponding to grief, supplying a helpful parallel for Cic. Tusc. 3.83 and Plut. Virt. Mor. 449a. The topic may well have been discussed by Posidonius, as suggested by Cooper and others, but Posidonius' attested innovations are rather different in character from the points which have caught the attention of Philo. Taking together the indirect evidence of Philo, Seneca, and Cicero, we may reasonably infer that the oαα concept belonged already to an earlier period of Stoicism.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
More on 'Aα in the Meno
By Sharples Bob
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 44, Iss. 4, 1999-08 ,pp. :
Tóo e i'α nella Retorica di Aristotele
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 48, Iss. 3, 2003-07 ,pp. :
By Nolan Daniel
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 51, Iss. 2, 2006-04 ,pp. :