

Author: Mina Mikhail V.
Publisher: Brill
ISSN: 1568-542X
Source: Netherlands Journal of Zoology, Vol.42, Iss.2-3, 1991-01, pp. : 200-213
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The past and present of fish faunas within the borders of the USSR are considered. In most regions, natural faunas have become locally impoverished and in many regions new faunas have formed, including both native and introduced species. It seems evident that there can be no single universal strategy of fish fauna protection for the USSR or for other vast administrative areas. Protective measures should be designed for natural regions (big lakes or river basins) within which damaged fish communities could be restored under favourable conditions if some subregions preserved their faunas. Introductions of non-native species can be unavoidable but they should have a solid scientific basis. Thorough faunistic, ecological, and genetical studies of fishes in the USSR are urgently needed.
Related content


Are the Major Fish Faunas Well-Known?
Netherlands Journal of Zoology, Vol. 42, Iss. 2-3, 1991-01 ,pp. :


Fish Resources; Threats and Protection
Netherlands Journal of Zoology, Vol. 42, Iss. 2-3, 1991-01 ,pp. :




Local and Regional Diversity in Some Aegean Land Snail Faunas
Journal of Molluscan Studies, Vol. 66, Iss. 2, 2000-05 ,pp. :


Fish Immunology and Fish Health
Netherlands Journal of Zoology, Vol. 42, Iss. 2-3, 1991-01 ,pp. :