

Author: Korpela Ilkka Sakari Tokola Timo Erkki
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
ISSN: 0015-749X
Source: Forest Science, Vol.52, Iss.2, 2006-04, pp. : 136-147
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Two aerial image-based estimation chains were compared for their potential in the assessment of timber resources. The two chains consisted of two- and three-dimensional image measurements followed by indirect model estimation. The effects of various errors at both the single-tree and stand levels were examined with Monte Carlo simulation. The three-dimensional multiview estimation chain with height measurements of individual trees proved less prone to random and systematic errors than the monoscopic chain. An upper limit of accuracy at the single-tree level is determined mainly by the allometric correlations. Volume estimates of single trees showed estimation accuracies (root-mean-square error, RMSE) of ∼15–20% and 35–40% in the multiview and monoscopic chains, respectively. This is lower than the accuracy achievable in the field, which is ∼6%. Image-based single-tree forest inventory is prone to systematic measurement and model errors, and in a simulation for the total effect of error sources, upper estimation accuracies (RMSE) of ∼15% and 30% for stand volume were computed using full mapping of the stand with the multiview and monoscopic estimation chains, respectively.
Related content








By Neuendorff Jonathan K. Nagel Linda M. Webster Christopher R. Janowiak Maria K.
Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, 2007-09 ,pp. :