

Author: Charnley Susan Cerveny Lee K.
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
ISSN: 0022-1201
Source: Journal of Forestry, Vol.109, Iss.6, 2011-09, pp. : 313-320
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
For a century, US Forest Service experimental forests and ranges (EFRs) have been a resource for scientists conducting long-term research relating to forestry and range management. Social science research has been limited, despite the history of occupation and current use of these sites for activities ranging from resource extraction and recreation to public education. This article encourages researchers to take advantage of the rich, though largely untapped, potential EFRs offer for social science by describing their many human dimensions and providing an overview of potential research topics. These topics include human uses, economics, historical studies, population and land-use change, human values, and interdisciplinary social-ecological studies. Lack of awareness among social scientists, limited budgets and networking, and the predominance of biophysical scientists who administer and conduct research at EFRs appear to be inhibiting the development of social science research there. We suggest ways of overcoming these barriers.
Related content


The Role of Experimental Forests in Science and Management
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 110, Iss. 5, 2012-07 ,pp. :


Ecological Restoration and the US Forest Service
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 105, Iss. 6, 2007-09 ,pp. :


Forest Service Salaries and the Future of the National Forests
By Leopold Aldo
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 1919-04 ,pp. :




A Diagnosis of the Forest Service's "Social Context"
By Voth Donald E. Fendley Kim Farmer Frank L.
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 92, Iss. 9, 1994-09 ,pp. :