Author： Buchman Roland G. Shifley Stephen R.
Publisher： Society of American Foresters
ISSN： 0022-1201
Source： Journal of Forestry, Vol.81, Iss.4, 1983-04, pp. : 232-254
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The number and complexity of forest growth projection systems may make the task of evaluating and comparing alternative systems seem overwhelming. Evaluations typically require the synthesis of many quantitative and qualitative factors. Managers can often benefit by separately considering the application environment, the performance, and the design of each candidate system. Although selection of evaluation criteria depends largely upon the application being considered, guidance is available from the many evaluation criteria in the literature.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
