

Author: Lee Karen J. Kaiser H. Fred Alig Ralph J.
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
ISSN: 0148-4419
Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol.16, Iss.4, 1992-11, pp. : 204-208
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Although public tree planting programs are designed to correct market failures, their only result may be a transfer of income if cost-shared planting is being substituted for private investment in tree planting. Previous research and anecdotal evidence suggests: (1) that nonindustrial owners use public cost-sharing funds even when they would have planted anyway, and (2) that forest industry and/or nonindustrial owners plant fewer acres because of large nonindustrial cost-sharing programs. We addressed these questions using an economic model and did not find conclusive evidence of substitution. Without substitution, increased inventories and hence increased timber supplies should result from the public tree planting programs. South. J. Appl. For. 16(4):204-208
Related content


Public or Private Production of Planting Stock--Which?
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 1924-04 ,pp. :






By Huang Ching-Hsun Kronrad Gary D. Morton Jason D.
Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 2005-02 ,pp. :


Private Planting in Pennsylvania
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 16, Iss. 7, 1918-11 ,pp. :