

Author: West Patrick C. Fly J. Mark Blahna Dale J. Carpenter Eugene M.
Publisher: Society of American Foresters
ISSN: 0742-6348
Source: Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol.5, Iss.4, 1988-12, pp. : 265-270
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Personal contact is more effective than targeted mailings or mass media in transmitting specific NIPF management advice, and in gaining adoption of that advice by NIPF owners, based on a survey of 220 NIPF owners in northern Lower Michigan. Interpersonal influence by friends, neighbors, and relatives was equally important as contact with professional foresters as a source of NIPF management advice. Peer influence was a significant source of advice about timber management and timber harvesting. This advice had about as much effect on adoption as advice given by private sector foresters, and a greater effect than advice given by state or federal forestry professionals. These findings suggest that investment in communications strategies should emphasize programs of targeted personal contact. However, recognizing the importance of lay peer influence implies that foresters should contact opinion leaders in the community first, and gain their approval so that informal influence among friends and neighbors of NIPF will be as positive as possible. North. J. Appl. For. 5:265-270, December 1988.
Related content


Ecosystem-Based Management on Multiple NIPF Ownerships
By Cambell Susan M. Kittredge David B.
Journal of Forestry, Vol. 94, Iss. 2, 1996-02 ,pp. :


Identifying NIPF Management Motivations with Qualitative Methods
By Bliss John C. Martin A. Jeff
Forest Science, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 1989-06 ,pp. :






By Snider Anthony G. Cubbage Frederick W.
Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 30, Iss. 2, 2006-05 ,pp. :