

Author: Horowitz Rachel A McCall Grant S
Publisher: Maney Publishing
ISSN: 2042-4582
Source: Journal of Field Archaeology, Vol.38, Iss.4, 2013-11, pp. : 347-361
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper addresses the definitions of the term “curation” and the utility of various techniques for its quantification based on morphometric, isometric, and geometric characteristics of bifacial projectile points. The definitions were evaluated through the comparative application of curation indices to a collection of Archaic projectile points from the Southwestern United States. Bifacial projectile points from the Walt Jones Farm site (10Br9), Georgia, were analyzed with the accompanying debitage using curation indices and non-indexical measures. Comparisons of the curation indices with non-indexical measures allow an examination of the utility of the term “curation,” and we argue that indices of curation cannot operate in a vacuum without additional information concerning an assemblage.
Related content


Magdalenian Children: Projectile Points, Portable Art and Playthings
Oxford Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 37, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. :




Colors for a North American past
World Archaeology, Vol. 37, Iss. 1, 2005-03 ,pp. :


North American overkill continued?
Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. :


The catastrophic extinction of North American mammoths and mastodonts
By Haynes Gary
World Archaeology, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, 2002-02 ,pp. :