Comparing Physician and Administrator Responses to Cesarean Section Guidelines and Actual Practice

Author： Sonnad Seema S.   Moyer Cheryl A.   Bernstein Steven J.  

Publisher： Joint Commission Resources

ISSN： 1553-7250

Source： Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol.26, Iss.9, 2000-09, pp. : 515-524

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Role of the Physician in Disability Management: Assessing Family Physicians' View of Discrepancies Between Practice and Canadian Medical Association Guidelines

By  

International Journal of Disability Management, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2007-05 ,pp. : 57-72

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Risks and morbidity associated with previous cesarean section

By Dodd Jodie M   Crowther Caroline A  

Women's Health, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. : 55-61

Future Medicine

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cesarean Section on Request: A Case for Common Sense

By  

Gynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau, Vol. 42, Iss. 1, 2002-05 ,pp. : 19-21

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Elective Cesarean Section- the Right Choice for Whom?

By  

Current Women's Health Reviews, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. : 85-88

Bentham Science Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Safety of Spinal Anesthesia in a Patient with Achondroplasia for Cesarean Section

By  

Current Drug Safety, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2011-04 ,pp. : 130-131

Bentham Science Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite