The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule

ISSN： 0010-0285

Source： Cognitive Psychology, Vol.45, Iss.1, 2002-08, pp. : 45-94

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out?

By McClelland J.L. Patterson K.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 6, Iss. 11, 2002-11 ,pp. : 465-472

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On Modeling Cognition and Culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations

By Henrich Joseph Boyd Robert

Journal of Cognition and Culture, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. : 87-112

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The past and future of the past tense

By Pinker S. Ullman M.T.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 6, Iss. 11, 2002-11 ,pp. : 456-463

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli

By Fei Li VanRullen Rufin Koch Christof Perona Pietro

Visual Cognition, Vol. 12, Iss. 6, 2005-08 ,pp. : 893-924

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rules, representations, and the English past tense

By Marslen-Wilson W. Tyler L.K.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 2, Iss. 11, 1998-11 ,pp. : 428-435

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite