

Author: Holt B. Benfer R.A.
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 0047-2484
Source: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol.39, Iss.3, 2000-09, pp. : 289-296
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The problem of missing data is common in all fields of science. Various methods of estimating missing values in a dataset exist, such as deletion of cases, insertion of sample mean, and linear regression. Each approach presents problems inherent in the method itself or in the nature of the pattern of missing data. We report a method that (1) is more general in application and (2) provides better estimates than traditional approaches, such as one-step regression. The model is general in that it may be applied to singular matrices, such as small datasets or those that contain dummy or index variables. The strength of the model is that it builds a regression equation iteratively, using a bootstrap method. The precision of the regressed estimates of a variable increases as regressed estimates of the predictor variables improve. We illustrate this method with a set of measurements of European Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic human postcranial remains, as well as a set of primate anthropometric data. First, simulation tests using the primate data set involved randomly turning 20% of the values to “missing”. In each case, the first iteration produced significantly better estimates than other estimating techniques. Second, we applied our method to the incomplete set of human postcranial measurements.
Related content






Visual Anthropology, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. :


The phantasy of theory and the missing people
By Berghahn Journals João Berghahn Journals Sebastián Ramírez
Focaal, Vol. 2012, Iss. 63, 2012-06 ,pp. :


What is missing in measures of Women's Empowerment?
Journal of Human Development, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 2006-07 ,pp. :