Archaeological Paradigms, Provincialism, and Semantics: A Reply to Beck's Comments

Author： Tankersley K.B.  

Publisher： Academic Press

ISSN： 0305-4403

Source： Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol.23, Iss.3, 1996-03, pp. : 455-458

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Comments on Terje Brattli: 'Managing the Archaeological World Cultural Heritage: Consensus or Rhetoric?'

By Burstrom Mats  

Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 42, Iss. 2, 2009-11 ,pp. : 183-203

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to Comments on The Social Context of Settlement in Norway in the First Millennium AD

By Skre Dagfinn  

Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 34, Iss. 1, 2001-07 ,pp. : 24-34

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comments on Charlotte Damm (2005): Archaeology, Ethnohistory and Oral Traditions: Approaches to the Indigenous Past. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38 , 73–87.

By  

Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2006-06 ,pp. : 70-79

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comments on Alfredo González-Ruibal: The Past is Tomorrow: Towards an Archaeology of the Vanishing Present. Norwegian Archaeological Review 39, 110-125.

By  

Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 40, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. : 94-102

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comments on Jan Harding (2005): Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐term Structural History and the Temporality of the Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38 , 88–101.

By  

Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2006-06 ,pp. : 80-97

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite