Author: Raaijmakers J.G.W. Schrijnemakers J.M.C. Gremmen F.
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 0749-596X
Source: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol.41, Iss.3, 1999-10, pp. : 416-426
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Although Clark's (1973) critique of statistical procedures in language and memory studies (the “language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”) has had a profound effect on the way such analyses have been carried out in the past 20 years, it seems that the exact nature of the problem and the proposed solution have not been understood very well. Many investigators seem to assume that generalization to both the subject population and the language as a whole is automatically ensured if separate subject (
Related content
Common issues but alternative solutions and innovations
Advances in Speech Language Pathology, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. :
Plain language as alternative textualisation
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Vol. 28, Iss. 2, 2010-11 ,pp. :
Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?
By Keysar B. Shen Y. Glucksberg S. Horton W.S.
Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 43, Iss. 4, 2000-11 ,pp. :
Can we know how language began?
Language and Dialogue, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 2014-01 ,pp. :
How scientific terminology crosses language barriers
Babel, Vol. 42, Iss. 2, 1996-01 ,pp. :