Author： Woudstra E. C. Roesink J. M. Rosemann M. Brunsting J. F. Driessen C. Orta T. Konings A. W. T. Peacock J. H. Kampinga H. H.
Publisher： Informa Healthcare
ISSN： 1362-3095
Source： International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol.70, Iss.6, 1996-12, pp. : 693-703
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The role of variation in susceptibility to DNA damage induction was studied as a determinant for cellular radio sensitivity. Comparison of the radiosensitive HX142 and radio resistant RT112 cell lines previously revealed higher susceptibility to X-ray-induced DNA damage in the sensitive cell line using non-denaturing elution, but not when using alkaline unwinding. The present data also show that no difference in the amount of initial damage is seen when pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or comet analysis are used for DNA damage assessment. However, using the halo assay or a modified version of PFGE in which the higher DNA architecture remained partially intact, the radiosensitive cells showed steeper dose-response curves for initial DNA damage than the radioresistant cells. Analysis of the protein composition of DNA-nucleoid structures revealed substantial differences when isolated from HX142 orRT112 cells.From our data, it is concluded that HX142 and RT112 differ in their structural organization of chromatin. As no differences in the kinetics of DNA damage rejoining were found, it is hypothesized that the same amount of lesions have a different impact in the two cell lines in that the 'presentation' of DNA damage alters the ratio of repairable to non-repairable DNA damage.
Related content
By Wouters B. G. Sy A. M. Skarsgard L. D.
International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 70, Iss. 6, 1996-12 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
By Ng C. E. Banerjee S. K. Pavliv M. Wang G. Raaphorst G. P. Aubin R. A.
International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 75, Iss. 11, 1999-11 ,pp. :
By Milner A.E. Gordon D.J. Turner B.M. Vaughan A.T.M.
International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 63, Iss. 1, 1993-01 ,pp. :