A new tool for the resection of aortic valves: In-vitro results for turning moments and forces using Nitinol cutting edges

Author: Hauck Florian   Wendt Daniel   Muller Wiebke   Stuhle Sebastian   Wendt Hermann   Thielmann Matthias   Kipfmuller Brigitte   Vogel Bernd   Jakob Heinz  

Publisher: Informa Healthcare

ISSN: 1364-5706

Source: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, Vol.18, Iss.3, 2009-01, pp. : 164-171

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

The use of minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement (AVR) may be limited for severely calcified and degenerated stenotic aortic valves. A quick resection leaving a defined geometry would be advantageous. Therefore, a new minimally invasive resection tool was developed, using rotating foldable cutting edges. This report describes the first experimental in-vitro results of measuring turning moment and forces during cutting of test specimens. Nitinol cutting edges were mounted on a simplified version of the resection instrument. The instrument shaft was combined with an exchangeable gear (1:3.71 vs. 1:5.0), and an exchangeable screw thread for accurate feed motion (0.35 mm or 0.5 mm) was implemented. Furthermore, the option of an added stabilisation body (SB) to prevent strut-torsion during cutting was tested. Tests were performed upon specially designed test specimens, imitating native calcified aortic valves. Resection was successful in all 60 samples (12 samples for each of the five configurations). Mean resection time ranged from 18.7±1.0 s (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.5, with SB) to 29.3±4.6 s (gear 1:5, screw thread 0.35, with SB), mean maximum turning moment ranged from 2.1±0.2 Nm (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.35, with SB) to 2.8±0.4 (gear 1:5, screw thread 0.35, with SB), mean maximum force from 36.0±11.3 N (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.35, with SB) to 56.3±10.5 N (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.5, without SB) and mean number of required rotations from 41.3±2.9 (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.5, with SB) to 59.1±3.7 (gear 1:3.71, screw thread 0.35, without SB). In summary, the positive influence of the stabilisation body could be shown. Combining the right parameters, it is possible to limit maximum cutting forces to Fmax<50 N and maximum turning moments to Mmax< 3.0 N.